Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 205 Location: Sydney NSW, Parramatta
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 12:52 am Post subject:
Oh man that guy copped so much shit about his car its not even funny.
Plus as far as it looks its not compliable in the current condition. _________________
well to comply, it needs to be brought back to stock, so bye bye crazy bodykit, and (thankfully) that ski jump of a wing.
i feel sorry for the guy for buying it and realising he couldnt comply it, but then again, he was an arrogant prick about receiving a "show car" for dirt cheap etc _________________
Dazwaaah wrote:
techno vikings EVERYWHERE!!!!
seriously thats how they all dance... walk for a bit.. then viking that shit... walk... VIKING... WAAAAALK... VVVVIIIIKKKKIIIINNNNGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!
hey, I prefer that "wing" over the stock one, thats for sure.
I cant see this car being returned to stock without spending $5000+ doing so, (unless they accept cars with mismatched coloured panels, and primer over half the car?)
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1148 Location: melb, aus.
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:56 am Post subject:
body kit items dont need to be returned to stock for compliance unless it effects the position of the lights.
however, i think this particular example is overboard. the rear wing (skate ramp?) blocks view of the third brake light. it cant be removed easily either, it looks moulded into the body. new boot would be required maybe.
body kit items dont need to be returned to stock for compliance unless it effects the position of the lights.
body kit is one thing, but what appear to be aftermarket fibreglass fenders, and modded rear wheel arches may very well need to be "are you sure thats not stock?"
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum